🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.